Disconsent is the scream. Unconsent is the act.
This site is for the part of you that knows something is wrong and refuses to perform calmness for people who profit from your silence.
Artifact vs Attractor: iunconsent.com is the artifact (stable, witnessed). disconsent.com is the attractor (continuous, evolving, emotionally true).
Copy-paste rants (choose your flavor)
“If at any time I ever said you could use my data in ways I didn’t reasonably expect, I withdraw it now. No means no. For data too. I unconsent.”
“I didn’t consent to be profiled into a behavioral weapon. I didn’t consent to my attention being mined, modeled, and sold. I didn’t consent to shadow dossiers, inference engines, and ‘personalization’ that manipulates me while pretending to serve me. If consent 🝁 matters anywhere, it matters here. I withdraw permission. I unconsent.”
“They didn’t build the internet—they built a trap. They call it ‘free’ while the price is your nervous system, your relationships, your democracy, your kids. They vacuum up everything they can touch: clicks, pauses, friends, locations, inferences—then pretend it’s normal because everyone does it. I’m not negotiating with a data farm. I’m drawing a boundary 🝚. I withdraw consent 🝁. I unconsent.”
Note on acceptance → love: Acceptance here does not mean approval. It means seeing clearly enough to choose cleanly. (acceptance → unconditional love)
Write your own (then clip it)
If you want it to spread, make it speakable. Use your voice. Keep it personal. Keep it true.
Receipts (the pattern, not the paperwork)
You don’t need a hundred citations to know you’re being harvested. You need one clear pattern: asymmetry.
- Extraction: they collect what you do + what you almost did.
- Inference: they predict what you are (and what you might become).
- Deployment: they shape what you see to change what you do.
- Denial: they call it “user choice” because you clicked something once.
This is why “opt-out” doesn’t feel real: the loop 🝳 is designed so you’re always downstream.
Not to “win.” To stop consenting to losing.
What they’ll say (and what it means)
Translation: “We value your data. Privacy is branding.”
Translation: “We’ll make the harm default and sell you the illusion of choice.”
Translation: “This improves our ability to predict and monetize you.”
Translation: “So don’t notice.”
Toolkit
Use these as captions, overlays, or end-cards. Keep it sharp.
2) “Consent 🝁 is not a scavenger hunt.”
3) “If it takes 40 screens to refuse, it’s not consent.”
4) “I withdraw permission for profiling + inference about me.”
5) “I’m drawing a boundary 🝚 with my whole voice.”
6) “The loop 🝳 ends where I say it ends.”
Overlay tip: put “I UNCONSENT” on screen for the last 2 seconds and point people to iunconsent.com.
Hashtags
Use a few. Don’t bury the message.
Keep it human. One sentence that hits, one link that counts.
FAQ
No. This is the attractor: the emotional truth. The artifact lives at iunconsent.com.
Because rage spreads and precision stands. We need both—separately.
Then you’re early. Or you’ve been trained to tolerate extraction. Either way: the boundary 🝚 is yours.
Exit ramp
When you’re done screaming (valid), do the clean thing (powerful).
Execute: I UNCONSENT →yesatom 🜁: show up. witness 🜹: be seen. boundary 🝚: be real. consent 🝁: be explicit.